FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 25, 2017
Contact: Jeffrey Moy, Vice President for Public Affairs, firstname.lastname@example.org
David Inoue, Executive Director, email@example.com
The JACL continues to oppose the Muslim country travel ban. The addition of three more nations to the Muslim country ban list does not alter the inherent flaws of the original order seeking to ban individuals based upon the majority religion of their country of origin. In fact one of the countries added, Chad, is yet one more country with a majority Muslim population; and the other two new restricted countries account for a negligible volume of immigration to the United States. Their addition does not disguise the true nature of the anti-Muslim order
As JACL has stated in its amicus brief to the Supreme Court, the foundations for this travel ban are weak at best, just like the case for mass incarceration of Japanese Americans during World War II.
Executive Order No. 13780 (the “Travel Ban Order”) – and the flimsy, illogical, and trumped up national security rationale upon which it rests – is such a repetition. Once again, the Government insists that this Court must accept its talismanic incantation of “national security” and shirk its core responsibility to take a hard look at arbitrary, discriminatory, and harmful treatment of a disfavored group.
We call upon the courts to fulfill their role in properly reviewing this executive order and the subsequent order on Sunday for the discriminatory foundations upon which they appear to be based and to address the authority of this administration to create new immigration law outside of Congressional action.
Justice Jackson compared the Court’s opinion in Korematsu to “a loaded weapon ready for the hand of any authority that can bring forward a plausible claim of an urgent need.” Korematsu, 323 U.S. at 246 (Jackson, J., dissenting). Engaging in a meaningful assessment of the basis for Executive action is the most effective way to place a trigger-lock on that gun. Rather than repeat the tragic errors of World War II, this Court should affirm the decisions of the Fourth and Ninth Circuits.
JACL and legal co-counsel will conduct a conference call for its members and the public to discuss the historical context of the Japanese American story and the legal arguments of the amicus brief on Tuesday, September 26 at 4:00pm EDT. To register for the call and receive call information which will be sent prior to the call, please RSVP here.